Jethro Tull ‎– Aqualung

Label:
Chrysalis ‎– 0190295611491
Format:
Vinyl, LP, Album, Reissue, Repress, Gatefold, 180 gram, The 2011 Steven Wilson Stereo Remix
Country:
Released:
Genre:
Style:

Companies, etc.

Credits

Notes

2018 Reissue of the remixed LP originally featured on the 40th Anniversary Collector's Edition of the album.
Comes with a 24 page LP-sized booklet with lyrics, photos and notes. Hardbound Gatefold Jacket

℗ 2011 Parlophone Records Ltd.
© 2018 Parlophone Records Ltd., A Warner Music Group Company. All Rights Reserved
Made in the E.U.

Barcode and Other Identifiers

  • Barcode (Scanned): 190295611491
  • Label Code: LC30419

Other Versions (5 of 382) View All

Cat# Artist Title (Format) Label Cat# Country Year
ILPS 9145, ILPS9145 Jethro Tull Aqualung(LP, Album, Gat) Chrysalis, Island Records ILPS 9145, ILPS9145 UK 1971 Sell This Version
FVT 41044 Jethro Tull Aqualung(Cass, Album, RE) Chrysalis FVT 41044 US Unknown Sell This Version
none Jethro Tull Aqualung (The 2011 Steven Wilson Stereo Remix)(11xFile, FLAC, Album, RE, 96k) Parlophone none 2015
CHR 1044 Jethro Tull Aqualung(LP, Album, Club, Gat) Chrysalis CHR 1044 US 1980 Sell This Version
M8C 1044 Jethro Tull Aqualung(8-Trk, Album) Chrysalis M8C 1044 US 1973 Sell This Version

Reviews

Add Review

WesHeadley

WesHeadley

December 7, 2018
edited 8 days ago

I've tried two copies of this issue and here's what I've learned. They pressed the LP's with dirty contaminated stampers. You can tell this when significant ticks and pops are present on the same tracks in the same places. The printing on the outer book cover is also of low quality in that it's very faded compared to any original issue. This is a shame as the inner booklet is great, the papers used are very nice quality, and the assembly of the book was very nicely done with even lines and a proper inner crease. Too bad excessive surface noise present in most quiet passages-- especially on side two-- ultimately ruins the enjoyment of listening to this masterpiece. This pressing should have been better. I also have the previous version of this from a few years back. Also a noisy pressing. I haven't checked the barely visible deadwax info but I'd guess this is a GZ-Media affair. They specialize in poor quality pressings that often, visually, look really good. Oh well...